An Analysis of Apology Strategies Used by Characters in Inside Out Movie

Authors

  • Wildan Farhan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Bramantya Pradipta Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/uncollcs.v3i1.4625

Abstract

Apology is crucial in communication for maintaining social harmony and resolving conflicts. This research examines apology strategies used by characters in the 2016 Oscar-winning animated movie "Inside Out." The objectives are to identify the coding schemes of apology strategies in the characters' utterance and determine the most dominant ones. Using Klimczak and Pawlak's (2014) theory and a qualitative descriptive method, data were collected by analyzing the characters' utterances in the movie. Employing a micro-linguistic pragmatic approach, the study reveals that direct apology strategies are predominantly used, influenced by factors like the severity of the infraction, social status, and cultural background. After analyzing the apology strategies in "Inside Out," researchers found 90 utterances: Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) with 18 appearances, Explanation or account of the situation (EXPL) with 17 appearances, Internal intensifiers (INT) with 11 appearances, Promise of Forbearance (FORB) with 10 occurrences, Offer of Repair (REPR) with 7 occurrences, Phatic communion (PC) with 5 occurrences, and the most dominant, Acknowledgment of responsibility (RESP), with 22 occurrences. The methodology involved qualitative observation and analysis of the movie, categorizing and coding the apology strategies. The study underscores the importance of direct apologies in animated films and their impact on interpersonal relationships and character development, contributing to the theoretical understanding of apology strategies and offering practical insights for further research in pragmatics and communication studies. Future research could explore more genres and contexts to validate and expand these findings.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Khofiyaa, N., & Silalahi, P. V. (2022). Deixis analysis on Joe Biden’s speech “Remarks on Afghanistan.” Anaphora, 5(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v5i1.6741

Klimczak-Pawlak, A. (2014). Towards the Pragmatic Core of English for European Communication: The Speech Act of Apologising in Selected Euro-Englishes (Second Language Learning and Teaching). Springer.

Mbeleng, F. J., & Marantika, I. M. Y. (2022). Apology Strategies Used by Characters in Yes Day Movie. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature, 2(1), 9–20.

Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D. (1986). Apology: a speech act set. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd, (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 18-35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Pradipta, B., & Sugiharti, D. (2022). ADJACENCY PAIRS IN STARSTRUCK MOVIE. PARAFRASE : Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan & Kesastraan, 21(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v21i2.5590

Searle, J. (1965). Philosophy in America. Cornell University Press.

Silvina, & Hartati, R. (2023). Apology Strategy In Disney And Pixar’S Luca Movie: A Pragmatic Approach. 12(03), 168–183.

Sinha, K. K. (2021). The Role of Pragmatics in Literary Analysis: Approaching Literary Meaning from a Linguistic Perspective. International Journal of English and Comparative Literary Studies, 2(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.47631/ijecls.v2i2.211

Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Mouton de Gruyter.

Yule, G. (1996). (Oxford Introductions to Language Study) Pragmatics. Oxford University Press

Downloads

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Farhan, W., & Pradipta, B. (2024). An Analysis of Apology Strategies Used by Characters in Inside Out Movie. Proceeding of Undergraduate Conference on Literature, Linguistic, and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 532-543. https://doi.org/10.30996/uncollcs.v3i1.4625

Most read articles by the same author(s)