An Analysis of Apology Strategies Used by Characters in Inside Out Movie
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/uncollcs.v3i1.4625Abstract
Apology is crucial in communication for maintaining social harmony and resolving conflicts. This research examines apology strategies used by characters in the 2016 Oscar-winning animated movie "Inside Out." The objectives are to identify the coding schemes of apology strategies in the characters' utterance and determine the most dominant ones. Using Klimczak and Pawlak's (2014) theory and a qualitative descriptive method, data were collected by analyzing the characters' utterances in the movie. Employing a micro-linguistic pragmatic approach, the study reveals that direct apology strategies are predominantly used, influenced by factors like the severity of the infraction, social status, and cultural background. After analyzing the apology strategies in "Inside Out," researchers found 90 utterances: Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) with 18 appearances, Explanation or account of the situation (EXPL) with 17 appearances, Internal intensifiers (INT) with 11 appearances, Promise of Forbearance (FORB) with 10 occurrences, Offer of Repair (REPR) with 7 occurrences, Phatic communion (PC) with 5 occurrences, and the most dominant, Acknowledgment of responsibility (RESP), with 22 occurrences. The methodology involved qualitative observation and analysis of the movie, categorizing and coding the apology strategies. The study underscores the importance of direct apologies in animated films and their impact on interpersonal relationships and character development, contributing to the theoretical understanding of apology strategies and offering practical insights for further research in pragmatics and communication studies. Future research could explore more genres and contexts to validate and expand these findings.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Khofiyaa, N., & Silalahi, P. V. (2022). Deixis analysis on Joe Biden’s speech “Remarks on Afghanistan.” Anaphora, 5(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v5i1.6741
Klimczak-Pawlak, A. (2014). Towards the Pragmatic Core of English for European Communication: The Speech Act of Apologising in Selected Euro-Englishes (Second Language Learning and Teaching). Springer.
Mbeleng, F. J., & Marantika, I. M. Y. (2022). Apology Strategies Used by Characters in Yes Day Movie. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature, 2(1), 9–20.
Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D. (1986). Apology: a speech act set. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd, (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 18-35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Pradipta, B., & Sugiharti, D. (2022). ADJACENCY PAIRS IN STARSTRUCK MOVIE. PARAFRASE : Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan & Kesastraan, 21(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v21i2.5590
Searle, J. (1965). Philosophy in America. Cornell University Press.
Silvina, & Hartati, R. (2023). Apology Strategy In Disney And Pixar’S Luca Movie: A Pragmatic Approach. 12(03), 168–183.
Sinha, K. K. (2021). The Role of Pragmatics in Literary Analysis: Approaching Literary Meaning from a Linguistic Perspective. International Journal of English and Comparative Literary Studies, 2(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.47631/ijecls.v2i2.211
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Mouton de Gruyter.
Yule, G. (1996). (Oxford Introductions to Language Study) Pragmatics. Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wildan Farhan, Bramantya Pradipta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.