Challenging the Norms Through Language: Unveiling Gender Duality and Identity in Tempest’s Hold Your Own
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/pcllcs.v5i1.6564Keywords:
femininity, gender duality, masculinity, gender determination, identityAbstract
Language plays a fundamental role in literature, particularly poetry, in shaping and directing the reader’s interpretation of the hidden meaning portrayed by the poet. In regard to this phenomenon, this study examines the construction of gender duality in selected poems written by Tempest in the anthology entitled Hold Your Own through a qualitative content analysis method utilizing retroactive reading and a purposive sampling technique. By juxtaposing the denotative and connotative meaning through the lens of linguistics and literary analysis, this research is theoretically grounded in Riffaterre’s Semiotics and Butler’s Gender Performativity theory. The data consist of thematically and strategically selected lines that reveal nuances of linguistics and literary patterns in representing gender identity. Findings demonstrate that feminime identities are predominantly articulated through lexemes or phrases corelated to softness, passivity, and negative light such as “watching them”, “school bench”, “be kind”, and “witch” meanwhile men are characterized by more assertive, dynamic, and power figure words such as “playing”, “football”, “kick”, “BMW”, and “above her”. The duality of gender is further illustrated through recurrent grammatical deviations such as “how many of yous”, “boy in her”, and “herself top boy” as well as frequent deployment of figurative devices such as simile, paradox, symbolism, hyperbole, and metaphor, one of which is “her shoulder is square”. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the ways linguistics and narrative strategies in Hold Your Own perform a fluid and complex gender identity, thereby engaging the myth of Tiresias and the contemporary discourse of gender.
References
M. A. Abdulrahman, “The Role of Language in Shaping Literary Identity: A Comparative Study of Modern English Literature,” J. Manag. World, vol. 2025, no. 2, pp. 414–419, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.957.
R. Jesudas and S. Gayathrri, “Exploring Identity in Poetry: Love, Loss, and Belonging in Sylvia Plath and Elizabeth Bishop through the Lens of Social Identity Theory,” South Asian Res. J. Arts Lang. Lit., vol. 6, no. 05, pp. 73–83, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.36346/sarjall.2024.v06i05.002.
C. J. Aquino and R. Salvador, “Exploring the Interrelated Roles of Text, Author, and Reader in Identity Formation through Literature,” J. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 2, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.69569/jip.2024.0042.
J. Butler, Undoing gender. New York ; London: Routledge, 2004.
J. Butler, Gender Trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, 10. anniversary ed. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Muzakka, “BUKU_Gender dalam Sastra Pak Muzaka FIX (1).” SINT Publishing, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eprints2.undip.ac.id/id/eprint/4334/1/Gender%20dalam%20Sastra%20Pak%20Muzaka%20FIX%20%281%29.pdf
K. Wise, L. Sabra, Margaret, Tsappis, and Michael, “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth and Family Acceptance,” Pediatr. Clin. North Am., doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.07.005.
H. Hnit and A. Almanna, “Constructing identity through narratives: Personal, social, and digital dimensions,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 12, p. 101692, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101692.
E. B. Voigt, “Poetry and Gender,” Kenyon Rev., vol. 9, no. Summer 1987, pp. 127–140.
M. Riffaterre, “Semiotics of poetry”.
R. I. Lohmann, “SEXUAL SNAKES STRIKE AGAIN”.
J. Butler, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. in Thinking gender. New York: Routledge, 1990.
M. Rendall, “Brain Versus Brawn: The Realization of Women’s Comparative Advantage,” SSRN Electron. J., 2010, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1635251.
K. Breen, “Personification and Gender Fluidity in the Psychomachia and Its Early Reception,” Speculum, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 965–1011, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1086/721645.
J. Stökl and C. L. Carvalho, Prophets male and female: gender and prophecy in the Hebrew Bible, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the ancient Near East. in Ancient Israel and its literature, no. number 15. Atlanta (Ga.): Society of Biblical Literature, 2013.
V. Salvina and T. Sulistyowati, SOSIOLOGI GENDER, 2nd Ed. Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia: Universitas Terbuka, 2022.
L. M. Diamond, Sexual fluidity: understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2008.
M. Hellinger, H. Bussmann, and H. Motschenbacher, Eds., Gender across languages: the linguistic representation of women and men. in Impact, studies in language and society, no. v. 9-<11, 36 >. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 2001.
S. Cordoba, Non-Binary Gender Identities: The Language of Becoming, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2022. doi: 10.4324/9781003120360.
M. Mirabella et al., “The role of language in nonbinary identity construction: Gender words matter.,” Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers., May 2024, doi: 10.1037/sgd0000729.
R. Connell, Gender: in world perspective, 2nd ed. in Polity short introductions. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Gusti Ayu Sundari Okasunu, Ni Luh Nyoman Seri Malini, Luh Putu Laksminy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




