Exploring Freedom in Margaret Wilkerson Sexton’s A Kind of Freedom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/uncollcs.v4i1.6043Abstract
Abstract. This research explores the concept of freedom depicted in Margaret Wilkerson Sexton's A Kind of Freedom through the framework of Kimberley Crenshaw's intersectionality represents, forms, types, factors, and narratives of freedom. The concept of freedom reflects process shaped challenges, conflicts, and social relationships. It highlights how characters experience freedom in the novel and social interactions.This study use qualitative descriptive methods which aims to provide a detailed and straightforward description of the characters experiences of freedom without excessive interpretation and sociological approach to literature which examines how race, class, and social structures influence the characters conditions and interactions, especially in the context of racial and social class. Stemming from systemic racism, historical oppression, and sociology limitations affect the characters' ability to define freedom. Key characters representing the state of bondage in the novel A Kind of Freedom are Evelyn, Renard, Jackie, and T.C. The relationships between these characters are analyzed in critical stages of freedom, such as social behavior that shows characters experiencing a lack of freedom. The findings of this study indicate that the forms of freedom depicted in the novel takes the form of racial, class, and personal freedom. Additionally, the research also finds types formal, social, and intersectional of freedom in the characters life experiences as freedom manifested within a social context. The last parts of the findings are factors that significantly shape the characters sense of freedom, including overlapping and intersecting identities, repressive political systems, and social and cultural norms that collectively limit personal agency and restrict the range of choices available to individuals.
Keyword: Freedom,Class ,Marginalized, Sociology, Intersectionality.
References
Barzoki, M. H., Kontula, O., Mokhtariaraghi, H., Mahboubishariatpanahi, N., Depper, A., Howe, P. D., Perpiñá PhD, C., Roncero PhD, M., Natenshon, A. H., Kehler PHD, M., Atkinson PHD, M., Chrisler, J. C., Digiammarino, A., Flynn, M. A., Park, S. S. S., Morin, D. T., Stana, A., Rafique, R., Hunt, N., … Valadez Martinez, L. J. (2015). Book Reviews. Journal of Child and Family Studies.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Danbold, F., Onyeador, I. N., & Unzueta, M. M. (2022). Dominant groups support digressive victimhood claims to counter accusations of discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104233
Hefner, R. W. (2021). Islam and institutional religious freedom in indonesia. Religions, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060415
Ingram, P. (2019). Radical freedom: Reading literature outside the canono Title. Palgrave Macmillan.
Katrinada, V., & Thoyibi, M. (2023). Women Resistance Towards Men Domination And Race Discrimination In Freedom Writers (2007). Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i3.5227
Nussbaum, M. C. (2020). The cosmopolitan tradition: A noble but flawed ideal. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
Wendy Brown. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. MIT Press.
Zwick, M. (2017). Freedom as a Natural Phenomenon. Foundations of Science, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9433-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mochammad Rafli Pontoh Pontoh, Agung Prasaja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




