Integrating Technology into Accounting Education: A Grounded Theory Study on the Use of Accounting Software in Practicum Classes
Keywords:
Technology Integration, Practicum-Based Learning, Accounting Software, Digital Transformation, Computerized AccountingAbstract
This study aims to explore how technology, particularly accounting software, is integrated into accounting education through practicum- based learning. Using a grounded theory approach, the research investigates students' and instructors’ perceptions, experiences, and challenges in utilizing computerized accounting systems during practical sessions. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving accounting students and educators from selected higher education institutions. The findings reveal key themes related to digital readiness, pedagogical adaptation, software usability, and professional skill development. A theoretical model is proposed to illustrate the process of technology integration in accounting education, highlighting both facilitating factors and obstacles. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how accounting education can align with the demands of digital transformation in the financial industry.
References
Bahtiar, R. A. (2023). Increasing Student Critical Thinking Through the Development of Public Sector Accounting Practicum Modules Based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(3), 112–125.
Barmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Dzuranin, A. C., et al. (2022). Disruptive Technologies: Implications for Third-level Accounting Education. Accounting, Finance & Governance Review, 27(1), 45–63.
Grabinski, K., Kedzior, M., & Krasodomska, J. (2020). Embedding E-Learning in Accounting Modules: The Educators’ Perspective. Education Sciences, 10(4), 97.
Owoc, M. L., Sawicka, A., & Weichbroth, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies of Implementation. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2102.09365.
Salim, A., et al. (2023). The Integration of Digital Technologies into Practicum Classrooms by Smartphone-Savvy Pre-Service Teachers in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 589–602.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Cullen, M. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2021). Grounded Theory: Description, Divergences and Application. Accounting, Finance & Governance Review, 27.
Khajavi, S., & Rezaei, M. (2019). Factors Affecting the Quality of Accounting Education at the Undergraduate Level in Iran: Grounded Theory. Journal of Education for Business, 94(8), 538–548.
Sosa-Díaz, M.-J., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). Grounded Theory as a Research Methodology in Educational Technology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221133228.
Cullen, M. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2021). Grounded Theory: Description, Divergences and Application. Accounting, Finance & Governance Review, 27.
Man, I. W. C., & Zainuddin, S. (2024). Examining Accounting Educators’ Intentions and Usage of Digital Technology: An Empirical Study Using the UTAUT Model. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(9), 1– 14.
Oben, J. A., Nwosu, L. I., & Mahlaule, C. (2022). Exploring the Impact of Digital Technology Integration on Undergraduate Accounting Performance: An Evaluation and Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3), 1–15.
Ong, T., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2019). Adoption of Emerging Technology to Incorporate Business Research Skills in Teaching Accounting Theory. Journal of Education for Business, 94(7), 480–489.
Owoc, M. L., Sawicka, A., & Weichbroth, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies of Implementation. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2102.09365.
Sosa-Díaz, M.-J., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). Grounded Theory as a Research Methodology in Educational Technology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221133228
