Consumer Trust in Green Property: The Role of Digital Transparency and Marketing Ethics in Improving Sustainability Performance

Authors

  • Dody Mulyanto
  • Martinus Budiantara
  • Indro Purnomo

Keywords:

Digital Transparency, Marketing Ethics, Consumer Trust, Sustainability Performance

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of digital transparency and marketing ethics on sustainability performance in the context of green property, emphasizing the role of moderating consumer trust. Growing concern for environmental issues has prompted companies to adopt sustainable practices, but the effectiveness of these strategies is highly dependent on consumer confidence and perception. This study uses a quantitative approach through a survey of 150 respondents who are actual and potential buyers of green certified properties in Indonesia. The measurement instrument was developed from the latest literature, validated by experts, and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results show that digital transparency, marketing ethics, and consumer trust have a positive and significant effect on sustainability performance. In addition, consumer trust strengthens the influence of digital transparency and marketing ethics on sustainability performance. These findings confirm the importance of trust-building strategies to improve the sustainability communication success and environmental reputation of green property companies. This research makes a theoretical contribution to stakeholder theory and relational marketing, and suggests practical implications for property industry players.

References

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Simintiras, A. C. (2020). Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101422

Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Management Science and Engineering, 4(2), 27–39.

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Towards green trust: The influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction. Management Decision, 51(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291300

Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (pp. 655–690). Springer.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Ferrell, O. C., & Hartline, M. (2020). Marketing strategy (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Gao, Y., Ma, Z., & Dou, J. (2021). Digital transparency, corporate reputation, and sustainability: Evidence from green innovation. Journal of Business Research, 133, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.036

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards 2021. https://www.globalreporting.org

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Rahman, M. (2020). Green marketing and consumer purchase behavior: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(9), 3856. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093856

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., & Azman, N. A. (2022). Green marketing, pro-environmental behavior and consumer trust in green housing. Sustainability, 14(7), 3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073824

Tetik, S., & Tuna, O. (2021). Greenwashing in green buildings: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 128027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128027

World Green Building Council. (2023). The role of green buildings in achieving sustainability goals. https://www.worldgbc.org

Zhang, D., Rong, Y., Chen, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Consumer preferences for green housing in China: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118658

Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. Y. (2014). Green building research – Current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Mulyanto, D., Budiantara, M. ., & Purnomo, I. . (2025). Consumer Trust in Green Property: The Role of Digital Transparency and Marketing Ethics in Improving Sustainability Performance. International Conference On Economics Business Management And Accounting (ICOEMA), 4(1), 241-255. Retrieved from https://conference.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/icoema/article/view/5592

Issue

Section

Articles